{"id":"W2488354164","doi":"","title":"An Access Control Scheme for Partially Ordered Set Hierarchy with Provable Security.","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"IACR Cryptology ePrint Archive","topic":"Access Control and Trust","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Hierarchy; Scheme (mathematics); Access control; Provable security; Set (abstract data type); Partially ordered set; Theoretical computer science; Access structure; Concrete security; Security analysis; Computer security model; Computer security; Cryptography; Secret sharing; Discrete mathematics; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004567249,0.0006176923,0.0009433401,0.001148743,0.002199359,0.002747958,0.001771432,0.001433221,0.003127379],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007586168,0.0003895136,0.00111602,0.001681222,0.003599411,0.009117905,0.00548125,0.002886383,0.0006914404],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002784094,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001086926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001083968,"domain_scores_codex":[0.995586,0.001168514,0.0003576539,0.0006067301,0.001822543,0.0004584816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942848,0.001786831,0.000763656,0.001814578,0.0006481336,0.0007019882],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002672936,0.0001373733,0.0005267111,0.0001948872,0.00005745048,0.0002069819,0.0007853918,0.006820219,0.008705305,0.9374821,0.005895221,0.03892106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003174006,0.0004821189,0.0006165848,0.0000735726,0.0001344611,0.000721662,0.0002423282,0.1040928,0.009534364,0.8511342,0.03253378,0.0001166694],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.04924808,0.0007158615,0.9311356,0.001956317,0.0003050133,0.0005764872,0.0007176096,0.001588972,0.01375609],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7481149,0.0004779159,0.2402871,0.0005227558,0.0003441744,0.0004096007,0.0007634177,0.00007799211,0.009002115],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004567249,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02415425,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03019837584626652,"score_gpt":0.3619801880290875,"score_spread":0.331781812182821,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}