{"id":"W2489948460","doi":"10.5539/jas.v8n8p59","title":"Gossypium barbadense: An Approach for in Situ Conservation in Cerrado, Brazil","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agricultural Science","topic":"Research in Cotton Cultivation","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico; Instituto Federal Goiás; Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária","keywords":"Gossypium barbadense; Endangered species; Geography; Cultivar; Sowing; Habit; Agroforestry; Biology; Horticulture; Agricultural science; Gossypium hirsutum; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00205424,0.0001106408,0.0001838039,0.00006898359,0.0001360181,0.0001326439,0.0006452042,0.00007077647,0.00002291195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008220264,0.00002866108,0.00006596072,0.001372237,0.0002106549,0.002081347,0.00005002323,0.000140896,0.000002184867],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002615877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005855424,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009424364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005714395,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980927,0.0001019148,0.0004679381,0.0002641154,0.0006715179,0.0004018309],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986849,0.0002957637,0.0002725231,0.00004441707,0.000529911,0.0001724322],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004518641,0.0001014955,0.02838864,0.000003094243,0.000001087789,0.00000162096,0.00008725886,0.00002266762,0.9563032,0.0002142349,0.0004642335,0.01436731],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004132779,0.0003579381,0.9673829,0.00004995472,0.000001396575,0.00003545181,0.0005112375,0.00006508953,0.03023339,0.0003349573,0.0005003497,0.0001140614],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9918144,0.0000287252,0.00005994073,0.007327884,0.0001085749,0.0002705994,0.000004472518,0.000008300747,0.0003771108],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981321,0.00002547982,0.001345864,0.0001091575,0.0002377201,0.00001104839,0.000004345753,5.345643e-7,0.0001337765],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9389942,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1508926,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05503375337119729,"score_gpt":0.3051907298730273,"score_spread":0.2501569765018299,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}