{"id":"W2490010249","doi":"10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.07.007","title":"The effect of communication on individual preferences for common property resources: A case study of two Canadian First Nations","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Land Use Policy","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Indigenous; Tourism; Promotion (chess); Context (archaeology); Compensation (psychology); Public economics; Public relations; Focus group; Marketing; Business; Political science; Environmental resource management; Economics; Social psychology; Psychology; Geography; Law; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002081989,0.0002755567,0.0003021182,0.0006960339,0.007484041,0.002480177,0.0009380289,0.001555658,0.004727555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006767469,0.0001441119,0.0003170647,0.001579528,0.00277906,0.0008922003,0.001024799,0.0012072,0.0001930607],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02307739,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0132522,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9485171,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9703484,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984913,0.0005948691,0.00002002478,0.00008093773,0.0002093575,0.0006035182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933943,0.004105453,0.0005127044,0.000203623,0.0009817089,0.0008022793],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002258174,0.003346178,0.5994337,0.0002199968,0.0002681829,0.009821662,0.2277176,0.01476484,0.004107188,0.03634422,0.01071006,0.09100826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001894654,0.0005859308,0.4838335,0.0001206479,0.0002059773,0.0007457886,0.4671361,0.01640547,0.001818098,0.005763942,0.02300401,0.0001909972],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9909394,0.00005208479,0.0001111939,0.000554852,0.000002898788,0.00001728488,0.00003870616,0.000002332767,0.008281182],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980896,0.00005453995,0.0001420675,0.00004250975,0.000001288593,0.000005710961,0.00001920201,0.000001685472,0.001643405],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05148286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.167439,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1360490537335111,"score_gpt":0.2774470851398999,"score_spread":0.1413980314063888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}