{"id":"W2492873250","doi":"10.1098/rspa.2016.0607","title":"Is a time symmetric interpretation of quantum theory possible without retrocausality?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences","topic":"Quantum Mechanics and Applications","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":126,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Perimeter Institute","funders":"Institut Périmètre de physique théorique; Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada; Government of Canada; Foundational Questions Institute","keywords":"Impossibility; Interpretation (philosophy); Argument (complex analysis); Causality (physics); Problem of time; Time travel; Mathematical proof; Ontology; Theoretical physics; Quantum; Mathematical economics; State (computer science); Closed timelike curve; Mathematics; Computer science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Quantum mechanics; Physics; Quantum gravity; Spacetime; Law; Algorithm","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00535502,0.0004953152,0.0007038842,0.0009307567,0.00189518,0.004131992,0.001983958,0.003060853,0.005448037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006864724,0.0004630028,0.001733706,0.0007274384,0.01486087,0.01414103,0.003677435,0.005748213,0.0007918099],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002274346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002221955,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001302876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001101002,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972005,0.001058389,0.0001647733,0.0005435136,0.0007071948,0.0003256804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958277,0.001597591,0.0005896478,0.001231064,0.0005236692,0.0002302851],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000259245,0.000002054018,0.00001577075,0.000005859121,0.000001642229,0.0000203794,0.00007457503,0.00007631011,0.00006541271,0.9990757,0.0001151938,0.0005445131],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005572062,0.000003852436,0.00001634535,0.000004558679,0.000001991006,0.00002125798,0.00004186123,0.0006079897,0.00007950352,0.9973195,0.001893906,0.0000036232],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0532301,0.00259171,0.6879157,0.04487287,0.001581425,0.00009213433,0.0003180125,0.0003209003,0.2090772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9191929,0.001126798,0.06497441,0.003541628,0.0004920091,0.0001121218,0.0001102667,0.0001447534,0.01030509],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005448037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02832037,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01055638493483472,"score_gpt":0.2506776680627471,"score_spread":0.2401212831279124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}