{"id":"W2492873250","doi":"10.1098/rspa.2016.0607","title":"Is a time symmetric interpretation of quantum theory possible without retrocausality?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences","topic":"Quantum Mechanics and Applications","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":126,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Perimeter Institute","funders":"Institut Périmètre de physique théorique; Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada; Government of Canada; Foundational Questions Institute","keywords":"Impossibility; Interpretation (philosophy); Argument (complex analysis); Causality (physics); Problem of time; Time travel; Mathematical proof; Ontology; Theoretical physics; Quantum; Mathematical economics; State (computer science); Closed timelike curve; Mathematics; Computer science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Quantum mechanics; Physics; Quantum gravity; Spacetime; Law; Algorithm","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003361481,0.00009495638,0.0002031524,0.00001300567,0.0002497367,0.00008635181,0.0003961646,0.00002145976,0.00001218927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005987363,0.00005947488,0.0001592478,0.0001345759,0.0002853529,0.0001332652,0.0001609026,0.0000915581,0.000002725504],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004703973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001070792,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006823323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":3.276769e-9,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993504,0.000002052927,0.0001549393,0.0001531005,0.0002051297,0.0001344086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995342,0.00007914779,0.0001859897,0.0001003158,0.00005927463,0.00004110225],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002171263,0.00007977249,0.0005699215,0.0001220674,0.00003115255,1.79954e-9,0.0007242374,0.00002873841,0.004710546,0.9933796,0.00005272978,0.0002990956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004570701,0.00002465661,0.0008524312,0.00008221634,0.00002351757,7.173718e-8,0.000114616,0.5419924,0.004690747,0.4521222,0.000002477686,0.00004895552],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9827081,0.00001066334,0.01430057,0.0002728447,0.00001765141,0.0001115976,0.000007880006,0.00001278245,0.002557916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988143,6.128987e-7,0.001026649,0.000008951362,0.00004435843,0.00001119538,1.301364e-7,0.000005699665,0.0000880502],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5419636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2425315,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01055638493483472,"score_gpt":0.2506776680627471,"score_spread":0.2401212831279124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}