{"id":"W2494548115","doi":"10.1080/17513758.2016.1213319","title":"Uniqueness of Nash equilibrium in vaccination games","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Biological Dynamics","topic":"Mathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models","field":"Medicine","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Nash equilibrium; Uniqueness; Mixing (physics); Mathematical economics; Homogeneous; Mathematics; Vaccination; Population; Monotonic function; Epidemic model; Mathematical optimization; Demography; Medicine; Combinatorics; Virology; Mathematical analysis; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001096613,0.00007354658,0.0005028044,0.00008321441,0.00000717499,8.819808e-7,0.00008799932,0.0002420848,0.0002973569],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001936147,0.00003186525,0.0001242606,0.00008216331,0.0001706758,0.00004291516,0.00003346872,0.0001601142,0.000003959604],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004726637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003191092,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":7.219502e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001698478,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989294,0.000150915,0.0006217292,0.00008206762,0.00006763251,0.000148292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985312,0.0009431442,0.0002445626,0.00007709068,0.0001251153,0.00007885456],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001033394,0.0005536544,0.1192904,0.00008143752,0.00005946086,0.0000653947,0.00002394429,0.00001913362,0.008388322,0.8516806,0.00003791425,0.01876641],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002004292,0.002115648,0.242502,0.0003256176,0.00004130663,0.0002830786,0.00003669699,0.01028045,0.001728449,0.7405322,0.00004679333,0.0001035252],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9508319,0.00007011353,0.04286839,0.004304378,0.00007374689,0.00006579482,0.00000319824,0.000005067085,0.001777384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983294,0.0001878268,0.001138651,0.0002161161,0.00003485178,0.000001181658,0.000001258647,0.000002915084,0.00008780452],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1232116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.325585,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03311954474161814,"score_gpt":0.3097306195137619,"score_spread":0.2766110747721437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}