{"id":"W2494548115","doi":"10.1080/17513758.2016.1213319","title":"Uniqueness of Nash equilibrium in vaccination games","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Biological Dynamics","topic":"Mathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models","field":"Medicine","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Nash equilibrium; Uniqueness; Mixing (physics); Mathematical economics; Homogeneous; Mathematics; Vaccination; Population; Monotonic function; Epidemic model; Mathematical optimization; Demography; Medicine; Combinatorics; Virology; Mathematical analysis; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002289746,0.0008786974,0.001606802,0.001392631,0.001283407,0.00257765,0.001379706,0.001743421,0.003274605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01384127,0.0005683809,0.001318815,0.0006388129,0.002698644,0.003159755,0.002009951,0.001484276,0.0005788344],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002072495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001820066,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002722487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001146099,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979922,0.0008784101,0.000095883,0.0004132768,0.0003090911,0.000311184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947525,0.003641932,0.0004895418,0.0001629639,0.0006730211,0.0002801209],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008479117,0.00006543398,0.001426928,0.0001776275,0.0000851417,0.0003274565,0.0005669932,0.09253506,0.00457951,0.8887311,0.001310528,0.01010936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005506599,0.00006318828,0.0005017685,0.00004848331,0.00002388407,0.000150262,0.0001861587,0.3257331,0.001593185,0.6699548,0.001642603,0.00004766964],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2055259,0.001048431,0.749861,0.001684725,0.0001201,0.0002290289,0.0003025079,0.0002541163,0.0409742],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9472575,0.0007447786,0.04405667,0.0002864728,0.00008138719,0.0004870149,0.000152774,0.00007477232,0.006858651],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003274605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01503712,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03311954474161814,"score_gpt":0.3097306195137619,"score_spread":0.2766110747721437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}