{"id":"W2494599767","doi":"","title":"Risk Criticism: Precautionary Reading in an Age of Environmental Uncertainty","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"BiblioBoard Library Catalog (Open Research Library)","topic":"Psychoanalysis, Philosophy, and Politics","field":"Psychology","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Criticism; Reading (process); Precautionary principle; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy; Law; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01300626,0.001272373,0.0007013595,0.003051806,0.01815774,0.02023775,0.002112822,0.009117014,0.005450663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04502957,0.0004912337,0.0006461799,0.001902434,0.07586468,0.02200608,0.008932875,0.0135191,0.001325337],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008287569,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003821489,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003440062,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002889449,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9765341,0.01819055,0.000507542,0.001149911,0.002806365,0.0008115455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94133,0.04633782,0.003139187,0.003011889,0.004728148,0.001452809],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002714306,0.00001676352,0.0003332633,0.0001618453,0.000009399213,0.0006127763,0.4627728,0.0001391969,0.0002731378,0.4956244,0.0324639,0.007565351],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001706912,0.00004753856,0.0005661084,0.0008436459,0.00001520559,0.0007837862,0.1626208,0.000305202,0.0006018591,0.2272078,0.6069367,0.00005436996],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0617353,0.0278688,0.0258302,0.4088629,0.01243498,0.0001192333,0.00008515324,0.0003579049,0.4627054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9140289,0.005794554,0.003087966,0.02978137,0.005853149,0.0001197373,0.00004719375,0.0005442509,0.04074289],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02023775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06878448,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0840643625260231,"score_gpt":0.3768426805590924,"score_spread":0.2927783180330693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}