{"id":"W2495435740","doi":"10.1037/pspi0000071","title":"Beyond one-size-fits-all: Tailoring diversity approaches to the representation of social groups.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Personality and Social Psychology","topic":"Gender Diversity and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":145,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Optimal distinctiveness theory; PsycINFO; Social psychology; Attrition; Psychology; Representation (politics); Race (biology); Categorization; Cultural diversity; White (mutation); Social representation; Social group; Sociology; MEDLINE; Computer science; Political science; Politics; Gender studies; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01878812,0.0004023954,0.0003843916,0.001107535,0.002066907,0.001914369,0.001101543,0.0008371166,0.002429088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05612773,0.0001770673,0.0003747384,0.0008616857,0.004399821,0.004498999,0.004225624,0.001534876,0.0003325745],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001403941,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003404688,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001257195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003241731,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9910074,0.006735279,0.0001818782,0.0006204508,0.00106758,0.0003873365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9651692,0.02365513,0.004015774,0.003437477,0.0009226106,0.002799816],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006105251,0.002231798,0.0502328,0.00068859,0.0002209543,0.0001095141,0.02435553,0.001322625,0.007543216,0.03135252,0.004897053,0.8764349],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001318173,0.01308519,0.3222697,0.002632066,0.0007901295,0.0007736459,0.06660745,0.01712648,0.02321051,0.4434963,0.1083858,0.0003045448],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8571258,0.002531303,0.07723278,0.03049552,0.0003754879,0.0008828511,0.0001098283,0.0002727335,0.03097368],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.966862,0.0005604331,0.0287812,0.002047469,0.0001082124,0.0004902715,0.00002492162,0.00002194659,0.00110354],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01878812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09936225,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.4408446688192658,"score_gpt":0.3842098241184017,"score_spread":0.05663484470086416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}