{"id":"W2495551685","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781316181645","title":"The Philosophy of Argument and Audience Reception","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":140,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argumentative; Argument (complex analysis); Rhetorical question; Epistemology; Agency (philosophy); Meaning (existential); Audience reception; Rhetoric; Sociology; Ambivalence; Focus (optics); Psychology; Social psychology; Media studies; Philosophy; Linguistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007468448,0.001068719,0.0008931958,0.003008588,0.005386578,0.01417297,0.001866107,0.006073304,0.007089171],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009883107,0.0005024962,0.0007963489,0.002824126,0.04012896,0.01724675,0.004648323,0.00787291,0.002221813],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004861882,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002669359,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006448787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007452854,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9888364,0.008304024,0.0002163554,0.0005455412,0.001656426,0.0004412973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9905856,0.008000094,0.000351832,0.0003582698,0.0004722975,0.0002318602],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005679848,0.000004588054,0.00003249419,0.00008289014,0.000003470363,0.00005002594,0.004767608,0.00006956869,0.00006189368,0.9860737,0.003099034,0.005748958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001102789,0.00001590339,0.0001023686,0.0003904032,0.000006100594,0.0001492967,0.002804034,0.0002194717,0.0001055441,0.8416368,0.1545515,0.000007473598],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.004703171,0.04614399,0.04502329,0.03187017,0.002208739,0.00005069788,0.00003691781,0.00007914755,0.8698839],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6696371,0.05207418,0.03222058,0.01097264,0.005745426,0.0005599182,0.0001264008,0.0004247549,0.2282389],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01417297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03949738,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06095400508634036,"score_gpt":0.2130385516083293,"score_spread":0.1520845465219889,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}