{"id":"W2496029585","doi":"10.22329/il.v36i2.4670","title":"Why Arguments from Expert Opinion are still Weak: A Reply to Seidel","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Expert opinion; Epistemology; Philosophy; Medicine; Intensive care medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06729632,0.0009355708,0.001676964,0.003392994,0.006110227,0.01103143,0.004372432,0.03244431,0.003843252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2707306,0.0007909566,0.001173029,0.002857534,0.03842204,0.02251453,0.008868114,0.03729922,0.002144119],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005947276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005515969,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003216249,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002384523,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9598718,0.02136158,0.002592839,0.004407788,0.01023894,0.001527035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.606111,0.3286809,0.01017246,0.01057946,0.04106905,0.003387016],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008400249,0.00003023853,0.0009075721,0.0002609972,0.0000843442,0.0004442987,0.01495218,0.0004177933,0.0002634494,0.7826005,0.1836651,0.01628954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006804513,0.00003735136,0.000528171,0.0008153071,0.00005243929,0.0002977693,0.006226979,0.001133339,0.0007903095,0.8262174,0.1637102,0.0001226989],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.003646034,0.002133735,0.00665453,0.9748532,0.003296385,0.000007057825,0.00001934896,0.0000365671,0.009353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2810827,0.004628206,0.00986976,0.6806827,0.01489956,0.0001197374,0.00005925768,0.0002233316,0.008434709],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06729632,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3559012,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08802790957842942,"score_gpt":0.2887014422054989,"score_spread":0.2006735326270694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}