{"id":"W2496724065","doi":"10.1075/dapsac.55.07wes","title":"The Qualitative Analysis of Political Documents","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Discourse approaches to politics, society and culture","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sophistication; Politics; Trustworthiness; Quantitative analysis (chemistry); Perspective (graphical); Discipline; Task (project management); Qualitative analysis; Qualitative research; Political science; Epistemology; Data science; Social science; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Computer science; Engineering; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000306474,0.0003174683,0.0006158826,0.00003800098,0.0008780953,0.0001601763,0.0003273269,0.0001680551,0.0001029415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002225159,0.0001960815,0.0006214777,0.00002686845,0.001860021,0.00005044314,0.0002095516,0.000320164,0.00001606165],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005863688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003320932,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001550906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001664206,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985561,0.00006986922,0.0004096245,0.0002887743,0.0003230609,0.0003525506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987228,0.0002277343,0.0002300912,0.0004932297,0.0001745712,0.0001515814],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003291932,0.00001571932,0.000002448123,0.00002766362,0.002798608,4.973609e-8,0.256787,7.289589e-7,3.801338e-8,0.7214836,0.01870211,0.0001787097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007825916,0.00004665409,0.000008338818,0.00003204319,0.001626665,1.748402e-7,0.287619,0.00002406323,8.272748e-7,0.08829302,0.6220475,0.0002234348],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002562889,0.004339517,0.0001776825,0.008555948,0.0001333402,0.0002889294,0.0006141123,0.00003247159,0.9856017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1378997,0.0007342715,0.0001297343,0.000832294,0.0005104929,0.00003661149,0.0002021863,0.00002759865,0.8596271],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6331906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7995971,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1626037375710497,"score_gpt":0.3464741306747391,"score_spread":0.1838703931036894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}