{"id":"W2498190889","doi":"10.1075/rllt.9.01alb","title":"Root gerunds in Old Romanian","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Romance languages and linguistic theory","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Gerund; Romanian; Linguistics; Root (linguistics); Assertion; Non-finite clause; Syntax; Operator (biology); Feature (linguistics); Computer science; Phenomenon; Process (computing); Mathematics; Dependent clause; Verb; Philosophy; Programming language; Chemistry; Epistemology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":{"n_in":0,"stratum":"aff_core","weight":5595.2375,"opus":{"tier":"OUT","genre":"empirical","about_ca":false,"confidence":"high","reason":"Theoretical syntax analysis of root gerunds in Old Romanian; the object is language, not research."},"gpt":{"tier":"OUT","genre":"conceptual","about_ca":false,"confidence":"high","reason":"The work studies Old Romanian syntax rather than research practice."},"grok":{"tier":"OUT","genre":"empirical","about_ca":false,"confidence":"high","reason":"Historical linguistics of Old Romanian syntax, not research as object."}},"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005505988,0.0003114562,0.0002748933,0.0005572747,0.0005395061,0.001067392,0.0003444944,0.0003502875,0.01066687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009590691,0.0002226398,0.0001887915,0.0004422227,0.001776912,0.001689929,0.0008388966,0.0007031417,0.001456044],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005765351,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001719972,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006518327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001579456,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997298,0.00009248218,0.00001684211,0.00006739236,0.00005136076,0.0000421799],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997433,0.0001272163,0.00004032153,0.00004886463,0.00003055442,0.000009839745],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002456229,0.00008989479,0.007724914,0.0002842921,0.00002541336,0.001382208,0.01522177,0.0002959996,0.01728904,0.845636,0.008429482,0.1033753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002394242,0.0003410495,0.07058914,0.0004975387,0.0001332734,0.01134788,0.01709093,0.00394056,0.04227832,0.3019398,0.5514646,0.0001375073],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.633604,0.0021077,0.009637958,0.0007025637,0.0001151415,0.00003731421,0.0003182616,0.000233015,0.3532439],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9808229,0.0003853246,0.002074235,0.0001244478,0.00003177555,0.00001106478,0.0002134595,0.0001888097,0.01614798],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01066687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01183299216917013,"score_gpt":0.2348752056885096,"score_spread":0.2230422135193395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}