{"id":"W2498351017","doi":"10.5962/p.373351","title":"Ongoing Recovery of 'Acacia chapmanii' Subsp. 'australis': A Case Study in Adaptive Management","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australasian Plant Conservation journal of the Australian Network for Plant Conservation","topic":"Forest ecology and management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"","keywords":"Acacia; Population; Key (lock); Adaptive management; Agroforestry; Biology; Ecology; Demography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000847775,0.0003308402,0.0002789039,0.0004738529,0.004525997,0.0009708239,0.001141819,0.001871088,0.001678821],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001767093,0.0001118803,0.0001909229,0.0005236314,0.001393432,0.0007346491,0.001113689,0.001574411,0.0002008775],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001914873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008731189,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03613253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1300492,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995195,0.0001458199,0.00002256996,0.00005312073,0.0001048093,0.0001542124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99914,0.0002201098,0.0001845617,0.0000660921,0.0001060977,0.0002830117],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"case_report","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004231014,0.00188293,0.1356713,0.0009262105,0.00007897924,0.3914756,0.193673,0.002350977,0.02607196,0.01080278,0.0145618,0.2220814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006236478,0.001934253,0.3654957,0.0003660411,0.0001043208,0.157263,0.2743302,0.003345546,0.007194026,0.004489172,0.1852819,0.000133474],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9806965,0.0007115054,0.0006886824,0.002826933,0.00004865125,0.0001045205,0.00004361111,0.00002565487,0.01485404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914488,0.0007106308,0.001633402,0.0004419095,0.00004718,0.00003668098,0.00003380687,0.000007506996,0.005640098],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03613253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0718444,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04889677769767567,"score_gpt":0.2382635385712567,"score_spread":0.1893667608735811,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}