{"id":"W2498781594","doi":"10.29173/alr246","title":"<i>Weak Courts, Strong Rights: Judicial Review and Social Welfare Rights in Comparative Constitutional Law</i>, Mark Tushnet","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Judicial review; Welfare rights; Social rights; Constitutional law; Judicial restraint; Welfare; Judicial activism; Human rights","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006368107,0.0005184104,0.0004466831,0.00280665,0.004018724,0.007981517,0.001309431,0.008108199,0.01261266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01253414,0.0005638919,0.0003698103,0.004197103,0.01546261,0.008768699,0.001420899,0.00426372,0.001728935],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01084845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006976429,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05774361,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.151993,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9963856,0.001918974,0.0001894807,0.0004002008,0.0007871537,0.0003186746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942609,0.00463523,0.0002975641,0.0001909967,0.000468801,0.0001464472],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001029005,0.00001216692,0.000265695,0.0001268728,0.000006819948,0.00004900959,0.0009491959,0.0001295726,0.00007248987,0.7230713,0.2605719,0.0147347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002883149,0.00001738855,0.003305506,0.0006468592,0.00001953812,0.00008229737,0.002064272,0.0003678049,0.0003138965,0.5687943,0.424329,0.00003041094],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.004950684,0.2960361,0.004566296,0.3584883,0.002504442,0.00006242451,0.0005330403,0.00009730566,0.3327614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4425186,0.1863774,0.008417685,0.0991819,0.01048972,0.0004844872,0.000511476,0.0002951753,0.2517235],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05774361,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.114815,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03604896672027261,"score_gpt":0.3020546763347799,"score_spread":0.2660057096145073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}