{"id":"W2498781594","doi":"10.29173/alr246","title":"<i>Weak Courts, Strong Rights: Judicial Review and Social Welfare Rights in Comparative Constitutional Law</i>, Mark Tushnet","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Judicial review; Welfare rights; Social rights; Constitutional law; Judicial restraint; Welfare; Judicial activism; Human rights","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006715633,0.0003804774,0.001298284,0.00004074291,0.00420451,0.00004066955,0.0003397111,0.0001493194,0.0008991102],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009385448,0.000316118,0.0002266818,0.0004134917,0.007163897,0.000421611,0.0001240113,0.000274693,0.0001916417],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002121228,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003374104,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0370184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3006304,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967424,0.0005864959,0.0007899456,0.00055337,0.0007236188,0.0006041892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987342,0.000356336,0.0002797362,0.000170975,0.0002743176,0.0001844376],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001021742,0.00009130204,0.00009413427,0.0003341449,0.00009160804,0.00002050348,0.0004228741,2.105151e-7,0.000001134911,0.9736169,0.02522599,0.00009098363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003569942,0.00002617393,0.000767815,0.002803378,0.0002761765,0.00002592788,0.00001900547,5.565265e-7,7.575204e-7,0.01060088,0.9847172,0.0004051358],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006331974,0.3146483,0.000004634229,0.01938032,0.000269575,0.001210692,0.00008432073,0.00003742617,0.6637316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8712893,0.1220101,0.00005006911,0.005289125,0.0005093128,0.0001654084,0.000116157,0.000007754754,0.0005627123],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.963016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999291,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03604896672027261,"score_gpt":0.3020546763347799,"score_spread":0.2660057096145073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}