{"id":"W2499690294","doi":"10.1093/gji/ggw281","title":"A new approach to assess isostatic compensation of topography in continental domain from GOCE gravity gradients","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Geophysical Journal International","topic":"Geophysics and Gravity Measurements","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Isostasy; Geology; Geodesy; Gravity anomaly; Post-glacial rebound; Gravimetry; Lithosphere; Anomaly (physics); Carbonate compensation depth; Geophysics; Seismology; Tectonics; Geomorphology; Ice sheet; Paleontology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002367985,0.0001233646,0.0002056698,0.0001606099,0.0000465855,0.00006413072,0.0003585759,0.00003280144,0.0003637954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004065245,0.00008729019,0.0001207251,0.0002069744,0.00003758969,0.0002740903,0.00002128508,0.0001371782,0.0001345255],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001841026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004450541,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003025357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004060947,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984689,0.00009154344,0.0003390813,0.0002167906,0.000674492,0.0002091453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992959,0.0001169498,0.0001700848,0.00009952831,0.0001126338,0.0002049313],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002107943,0.0003018358,0.9444523,0.000003899115,0.0001020661,0.000009466336,0.0003559545,0.00009114732,0.005012718,0.002156921,0.0007971062,0.04650582],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001032415,0.00006903271,0.9393138,0.00007938579,0.000007444991,0.000005586678,0.00006476519,0.0002944079,0.0002600249,0.05841447,0.0003466737,0.0001119485],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9857435,0.00001209486,0.0111776,0.000503953,0.0005960597,0.0001068163,0.000183112,0.000005243313,0.001671598],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945503,0.000005196508,0.004880989,0.0001142768,0.0002735176,7.903751e-7,0.00007514098,0.000003134135,0.00009660017],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05625755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4573455,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03208842377153386,"score_gpt":0.249193741031692,"score_spread":0.2171053172601581,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}