{"id":"W2500735702","doi":"10.1017/s1466252316000037","title":"What is the evidence that point sources of anthropogenic effluent increase antibiotic resistance in the environment? Protocol for a systematic review","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Animal Health Research Reviews","topic":"Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"National Pork Board","keywords":"Protocol (science); Antibiotic resistance; Antibiotics; Resistance (ecology); Effluent; Environmental science; Point (geometry); Medicine; Biology; Ecology; Microbiology; Environmental engineering; Mathematics; Pathology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03041365,0.0007407626,0.003633628,0.0001068838,0.0005436799,0.0001482068,0.002565475,0.0001758216,0.0008258756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001836627,0.0002979979,0.001001314,0.0008378723,0.001665319,0.0006452111,0.000854792,0.0009894433,0.001450358],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001028125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001958618,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001220928,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005123847,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9817564,0.01074014,0.002813144,0.001120173,0.002067175,0.001502968],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909434,0.004486798,0.002182741,0.001933844,0.00001553443,0.0004376683],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003686306,0.0002725441,0.00002490973,0.908249,0.00002831696,0.000009393104,0.0001753732,1.957642e-8,0.000004117797,0.00003824033,0.006855604,0.08430558],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001299628,0.0002861994,0.0000317288,0.5141128,0.000116566,0.00001714679,0.00004288673,9.14516e-7,0.000007557498,0.00003441893,0.4850452,0.0001746092],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.000002202109,0.7068783,0.000005549924,0.005018188,0.00001752421,0.287976,0.00003602017,0.000006135381,0.00006008684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00002172443,0.8969334,0.00008900604,0.002795866,0.00004294535,0.09971087,0.000004973908,0.00005495008,0.0003463233],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4781896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999472,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.4057168111278088,"score_gpt":0.5425211058775367,"score_spread":0.1368042947497278,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}