{"id":"W2500852598","doi":"10.1139/cjfas-2015-0199","title":"Assessment of size selectivity in hydraulic clam dredge fisheries","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","topic":"Marine and fisheries research","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sorting; Sieve (category theory); Selection (genetic algorithm); Fishery; Benthic zone; Enhanced Data Rates for GSM Evolution; Submarine pipeline; Environmental science; Marine engineering; Process (computing); Grid; Fisheries management; Scope (computer science); Computer science; Geology; Engineering; Fishing; Oceanography; Biology; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007156671,0.0003365132,0.0003510808,0.001425068,0.0001862107,0.0003806438,0.00052309,0.0004470863,0.001080622],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002144903,0.0002675295,0.0003728822,0.0004670072,0.0002719671,0.0004867537,0.0004925963,0.000135617,0.0002892681],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005522049,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000203294,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00689017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01158949,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996786,0.0000463477,0.00002292182,0.0001160643,0.0000897613,0.00004641034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987857,0.0005615086,0.0002892566,0.0000800118,0.0001756869,0.0001078477],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001002251,0.0001268646,0.8915375,0.0001118637,0.0001060156,0.0002515959,0.0002355406,0.009981803,0.07514864,0.0001551743,0.00008843817,0.02125444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006004746,0.0003409294,0.9805772,0.000005288199,0.00002910469,0.000147823,0.0001519633,0.01239939,0.006078199,0.00009245278,0.000157409,0.00001426005],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9977065,0.00008175451,0.001382652,0.000005538081,0.000001315171,0.00001957516,0.0001293276,0.00001101825,0.000662287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986265,0.00003978418,0.0007597539,0.000006493561,0.000001471547,0.00001422027,0.0001725633,0.000004351956,0.0003748264],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.00689017,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01370013,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01894260486540587,"score_gpt":0.2519343859679206,"score_spread":0.2329917811025148,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}