{"id":"W2501436801","doi":"10.1075/cilt.318.09dor","title":"An ergative analysis of French valency alternations","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Amsterdam studies in the theory and history of linguistic science. Series 4, Current issues in linguistic theory","topic":"Linguistics and Discourse Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Ergative case; Linguistics; Clitic; Specifier; Merge (version control); Hebrew; Nasalization; History; Mathematics; Computer science; Philosophy; Combinatorics; Transitive relation; Noun; Noun phrase","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006736713,0.0003394866,0.0009221419,0.001448183,0.0003438345,0.00004050368,0.001119605,0.00004227497,0.0008305555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009395708,0.0002525527,0.0001819984,0.0006219597,0.01166732,0.0001690961,0.0002050998,0.0002677713,0.00000390047],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001882051,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002015607,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008453577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00134886,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966179,0.0007347654,0.001073578,0.0005818924,0.000575295,0.0004165443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959424,0.00153949,0.0006151185,0.0007841425,0.001035546,0.00008337748],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009004995,0.000286478,0.0008592519,0.00008389122,0.0002217633,0.00001059469,0.4215458,0.00001573989,0.000004814578,0.5765323,0.0000270598,0.0003222508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003493283,0.0004284451,0.001455455,0.0003642098,0.002169687,0.000002081199,0.1181684,0.0003052315,0.00004172576,0.8618981,0.0143526,0.0004648074],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2935405,0.09328514,0.0003555799,0.00003456057,0.01792162,0.0007845361,0.0003206228,0.00008813077,0.5936693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956641,0.001429838,0.0002479046,0.00003966647,0.0007674129,0.00002746685,0.00001234211,0.00001571773,0.001795509],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7021236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999927,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09455873286648124,"score_gpt":0.3612905204718111,"score_spread":0.2667317876053299,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}