{"id":"W2501436801","doi":"10.1075/cilt.318.09dor","title":"An ergative analysis of French valency alternations","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Amsterdam studies in the theory and history of linguistic science. Series 4, Current issues in linguistic theory","topic":"Linguistics and Discourse Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Ergative case; Linguistics; Clitic; Specifier; Merge (version control); Hebrew; Nasalization; History; Mathematics; Computer science; Philosophy; Combinatorics; Transitive relation; Noun; Noun phrase","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001389894,0.0005365023,0.0002588634,0.001715709,0.001509442,0.002364374,0.0006002408,0.0008708614,0.004619134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002480911,0.0002488794,0.0004559717,0.0008528092,0.003297319,0.002801124,0.0009017951,0.0008549503,0.0004101266],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00209263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005350599,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00457297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003669936,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988212,0.0006067471,0.00006238041,0.0001797636,0.0002034884,0.0001264085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984699,0.0008673035,0.000128497,0.0001913744,0.0003151588,0.00002772364],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001252581,0.00003380374,0.002743008,0.0000969406,0.00001562512,0.0006078773,0.01334783,0.0006633514,0.01014776,0.9529446,0.0004598372,0.01881413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001079723,0.0003066057,0.03398096,0.0001728707,0.0001442414,0.004294842,0.02412767,0.021328,0.02759376,0.7771243,0.1106681,0.0001505808],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6973376,0.0009854139,0.1070028,0.001717844,0.00007412005,0.00005866097,0.0003040299,0.0003587383,0.1921607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916846,0.00009698046,0.003927715,0.0000629477,0.0000242487,0.0000140555,0.00006709323,0.00006365091,0.004058802],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004619134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0154525,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09455873286648124,"score_gpt":0.3612905204718111,"score_spread":0.2667317876053299,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}