{"id":"W2501671671","doi":"10.1590/0101-31572001-1256","title":"Growth and Security Under Welfare-Corporate Capitalism and Market Socialism","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Brazilian Journal of Political Economy","topic":"Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Capitalism; Socialism; Market socialism; Bureaucracy; Welfare capitalism; Economics; Market economy; Prosperity; State socialism; Welfare; China; Economic system; Welfare state; Political science; Economic growth; Law; Politics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005255196,0.0002280414,0.0006609338,0.0002535747,0.000173276,0.000175171,0.0001804682,0.000178071,0.0005126466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003322927,0.0002512471,0.0001473463,0.0001088473,0.0003825451,0.0005983105,0.00006401639,0.000314487,0.00002823074],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009902521,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005285501,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002143982,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002223456,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981061,0.00004131478,0.0009292514,0.0003141748,0.00003971591,0.0005694571],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985132,0.00007597412,0.0006711137,0.0001572447,0.00006931782,0.0005131774],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002764733,0.00005055924,0.01566284,0.00003325565,0.00005628226,0.00006871149,0.0003341874,3.442734e-7,0.000001648368,0.9823385,0.00123561,0.0001904334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001530011,0.0001479893,0.09874553,0.00002892579,0.00002403354,0.0006970855,0.0003041291,0.0001337036,0.00002541202,0.7676941,0.1302595,0.0004096532],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7191572,0.001791381,0.0003866773,0.01575881,0.000398633,0.0001093199,0.00006860839,0.00001619136,0.2623131],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954916,0.0004003151,0.0003130471,0.002788143,0.0005220894,0.000002520703,0.000002304093,0.00003122635,0.0004488057],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2763343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999994,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0199327402700222,"score_gpt":0.2212582361325527,"score_spread":0.2013254958625305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}