{"id":"W2501846789","doi":"10.5849/forsci.13-058","title":"Protecting Timber Supply on Public Land in Response to Catastrophic Natural Disturbance: A Principal-Agent Problem","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Science","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Forester; Business; Logging; Government (linguistics); Incentive; Disturbance (geology); Natural resource economics; Dilemma; Stumpage; Principal (computer security); Revenue; Natural resource; Salvage logging; Stock (firearms); Agroforestry; Economics; Agricultural economics; Finance; Forestry; Environmental science; Ecology; Engineering; Geography; Market economy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002271313,0.000168525,0.0001213094,0.0002313004,0.0003529384,0.0001805581,0.0007864597,0.0000300141,0.000228206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006735589,0.0001346145,0.00002969531,0.001479074,0.0004022647,0.0004544124,0.0005478158,0.0002408806,0.002192611],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003536218,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003686978,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006747953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00163319,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976851,0.0001159893,0.0002057749,0.0005762835,0.0006808576,0.0007359716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991815,0.00007337057,0.00006987691,0.0004418446,0.00001105065,0.0002223552],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004040979,0.0001717773,0.83672,0.00002189702,0.000002204787,0.0000184314,0.001730912,0.1446882,0.003552305,0.005571388,0.002988745,0.004130017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004425975,0.0003716904,0.9152353,0.0000603235,0.000002071621,0.000005268404,0.00001130214,0.03843168,0.0001022543,0.0006992858,0.04433341,0.0003048295],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9914025,0.00000278675,0.0001632221,0.002231411,0.0001227199,0.0007264397,0.000002762084,0.00004747297,0.005300669],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943003,4.310365e-7,0.001522172,0.0004276327,0.0000482561,0.0001297092,0.000002845288,0.00001186004,0.003556776],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1062565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985843,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.00977317021206736,"score_gpt":0.2383350820012603,"score_spread":0.2285619117891929,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}