{"id":"W2503099208","doi":"10.1533/9781845694579.273","title":"Life-cycle assessment (LCA) of wood–polymer composites: a case study","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Elsevier eBooks","topic":"Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites","field":"Materials Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Connaught Fund; University of Toronto","keywords":"Life-cycle assessment; Greenhouse gas; Global-warming potential; Environmental science; Service life; Environmental impact assessment; Waste management; Global warming; Materials science; Composite material; Engineering; Climate change; Production (economics); Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001432365,0.0007382287,0.0004360891,0.001296241,0.001317182,0.001214717,0.0009512464,0.001388488,0.003105654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001687369,0.0003059568,0.000845336,0.001340144,0.0004819459,0.0009332768,0.0005325122,0.0005211052,0.0004871766],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001966933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001027564,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01024545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01968144,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992141,0.0002557578,0.00002977583,0.00007205535,0.0003429117,0.00008544227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988871,0.0006896508,0.00006428335,0.00008574264,0.0002189718,0.00005423344],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001561263,0.003059075,0.03248597,0.0008619192,0.0001233667,0.01129557,0.002116918,0.5069212,0.07139909,0.01287745,0.005298599,0.3519995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001394552,0.003213661,0.02645222,0.0001730639,0.0001939695,0.004084873,0.003816501,0.8083241,0.1145528,0.01087077,0.02801603,0.0001625991],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9434692,0.000648318,0.02622501,0.0002602325,0.00002185403,0.0003486052,0.0005446112,0.0002321913,0.02825001],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9711023,0.000430531,0.0191115,0.00002755392,0.000008038654,0.0001017178,0.0002620161,0.00005527066,0.008901103],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01024545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02037162,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01874930442076918,"score_gpt":0.2712673358523615,"score_spread":0.2525180314315923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}