{"id":"W2503864016","doi":"10.1139/cjfr-2015-0508","title":"Using quantitative techniques to evaluate and explain the sustainability of forest plantations","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sustainability; Eucalyptus; Ranking (information retrieval); Eucalyptus globulus; Forestry; Econometrics; Variables; Statistics; Environmental resource management; Mathematics; Agroforestry; Environmental science; Geography; Computer science; Ecology; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002717646,0.0000715011,0.0001121225,0.0003354013,0.0002803599,0.00004563439,0.0003680577,0.00003169145,0.0004030046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001163136,0.00004042685,0.00003730371,0.0004488511,0.0008718285,0.0002440893,0.00008778453,0.0001433835,0.00002399784],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004594286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004158416,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0391996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2661048,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986182,0.0002435331,0.0002402349,0.0001113987,0.000396846,0.0003897131],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987926,0.0003791037,0.0000857352,0.0001846397,0.0001871523,0.0003708036],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006407807,0.00001214498,0.9632294,0.00001989466,0.00001838623,0.00003792311,0.002062658,0.0006564682,0.0004687273,0.01499407,0.01217429,0.006262006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003956238,0.0009080928,0.9153874,0.0001747948,0.00001939305,0.00004820457,0.001476982,0.0003359129,0.0006574711,0.04947325,0.03095745,0.0001654566],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9907538,0.00003809275,0.0005652017,0.005013795,0.00002543311,0.0003532705,0.0000144309,0.000001888332,0.003234061],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982554,0.00001806159,0.001007324,0.00004464641,0.00003186672,0.000007679966,3.535096e-7,0.00000777736,0.0006269288],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2269052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9671984,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1054787727829874,"score_gpt":0.4115158080453885,"score_spread":0.3060370352624011,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}