{"id":"W2504227307","doi":"10.5596/c16-016","title":"Librarian Involvement in Systematic Reviews at Queen’s University: An Environmental Scan","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Canadian Health Libraries Association / Journal de l Association de bilbiothèques de la santé du Canada","topic":"Health Sciences Research and Education","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; University College London; Health Canada; Agence Nationale pour la Gestion des Déchets Radioactifs; London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine; Purdue University","keywords":"Acknowledgement; Systematic review; Queen (butterfly); Library science; MEDLINE; Medicine; Political science; Law; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.3198661,0.0008678905,0.004818384,0.04881903,0.005279243,0.01672895,0.003824256,0.004892766,0.03188109],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6113569,0.004074324,0.003473337,0.1025159,0.005644488,0.02071114,0.01478148,0.004714687,0.006334589],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02472894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1131698,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0317852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08164675,"domain_scores_codex":[0.370463,0.3405086,0.1515116,0.01464127,0.1158348,0.007040744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.09744695,0.6359888,0.09290439,0.03801596,0.1289906,0.006653254],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016501,0.0001576922,0.09082937,0.3079296,0.003272052,0.001845981,0.0285104,0.0003217294,0.000919075,0.02345313,0.254458,0.2866529],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000738681,0.000327425,0.09912077,0.3519693,0.003505648,0.001187827,0.01343304,0.0006061402,0.001240354,0.0065161,0.5209734,0.0003812395],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04053696,0.456262,0.0181874,0.3167914,0.005465773,0.01076441,0.06243008,0.001082919,0.08847911],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3958139,0.2827766,0.0747494,0.1514948,0.003355648,0.04811163,0.02172167,0.002346721,0.01962971],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9832711,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8387262,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02196109519386952,"score_gpt":0.3075003523540468,"score_spread":0.2855392571601773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}