{"id":"W2504227454","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v32i1.4516","title":"WHEN DISCIPLINES COLLIDE: POLYGAMY AND THE SOCIAL SCIENCES ON TRIAL","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Adjudication; Charter; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Economic Justice; Humanities; Sociology; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06466483,0.0003839235,0.001209718,0.004065219,0.02794347,0.03283354,0.00290075,0.01872284,0.008230931],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1218391,0.0005591212,0.0005915434,0.003393192,0.08619568,0.02098471,0.01966517,0.01723951,0.0009148817],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0215574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04735581,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09458034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1414799,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9273409,0.04600542,0.001864089,0.003930366,0.0117264,0.009132768],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9022465,0.08112084,0.00317171,0.003351694,0.005267105,0.004842151],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003080189,0.0000189265,0.00142118,0.00005630464,0.00001180599,0.000381915,0.01455451,0.0001033481,0.00004310526,0.9464192,0.01872906,0.01822992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004633183,0.00003115096,0.002710004,0.001030775,0.0000223172,0.0001826538,0.02821803,0.0003058435,0.0001564672,0.8328214,0.1344149,0.00006006223],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03938704,0.03022658,0.005361612,0.6159695,0.002540503,0.00008857931,0.00007833514,0.00003726063,0.3063106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8459026,0.0116248,0.002659548,0.1108562,0.002540894,0.0002510029,0.00006217285,0.00007926755,0.02602345],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09458034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3419844,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1590766274158785,"score_gpt":0.4267420041314277,"score_spread":0.2676653767155491,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}