{"id":"W2504573137","doi":"10.5539/jmr.v8n4p166","title":"Mathematical Formulation of Laminated Composite Thick Conical Shells","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematics Research","topic":"Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Span (engineering); Conical surface; Mathematics; Rotary inertia; Shell (structure); Deformation (meteorology); Shear (geology); Inertia; Geometry; Structural engineering; Classical mechanics; Composite material; Engineering; Physics; Materials science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00142188,0.00009071166,0.0003525279,0.0003390916,0.00003670405,0.00003103976,0.0002368104,0.00008977205,0.0003369508],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002269535,0.00005359942,0.0001317799,0.0002921816,0.00006441038,0.0001543276,0.00004233577,0.0002366363,0.00002138227],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009124463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002885505,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":4.571261e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":7.071185e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981503,0.00007235968,0.0007600075,0.00005985226,0.0007675805,0.0001898901],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980567,0.0008045978,0.0001611586,0.0001940795,0.0006994971,0.0000840307],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007969106,0.0004648231,0.0004810629,0.001287715,0.0006278487,0.00003175734,0.002090329,0.02406646,0.9055748,0.04888433,0.002233308,0.01417786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002199941,0.0005089997,0.001523799,0.001899049,0.0001964745,0.0002569674,0.0003582441,0.626504,0.2669418,0.09851161,0.000741709,0.0003574407],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.698552,0.0001576154,0.2958607,0.0002558002,0.00006775487,0.0001427432,0.000004568405,0.00002075705,0.004937986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9763762,0.0001335985,0.02330938,0.000002082304,0.00005608166,8.0067e-7,8.453348e-7,0.00001878066,0.0001021729],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6386331,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3689376,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03661955301526055,"score_gpt":0.3313645622905371,"score_spread":0.2947450092752765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}