{"id":"W2504661623","doi":"10.1190/int-2016-0036.1","title":"A case study showing the value of multioffset synthetic seismograms in seismic data interpretation","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Interpretation","topic":"Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Penn West Exploration (Canada); University of Calgary","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Seismogram; Synthetic seismogram; Amplitude versus offset; Geology; Seismology; Amplitude; Offset (computer science); Reflection coefficient; Anelastic attenuation factor; Seismic survey; Synthetic data; Reflection (computer programming); Cretaceous; S-wave; Poisson distribution; Geodesy; Seismic wave; Algorithm; Paleontology; Statistics; Optics; Mathematics; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003350272,0.0007520861,0.0003202363,0.001823674,0.0005612224,0.001788615,0.0008919464,0.001291616,0.001389276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006741956,0.0003118246,0.000446707,0.002183567,0.0008750416,0.0007938581,0.001025358,0.0006802771,0.000306494],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006950714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005698987,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005407551,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01365644,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987124,0.0005375938,0.00008338586,0.0001364133,0.0004501478,0.00008011961],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937662,0.003560723,0.0003784258,0.0008955869,0.001164963,0.0002341301],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00212917,0.0006203154,0.1029449,0.0007651725,0.0002844141,0.02163953,0.00680017,0.2341488,0.08108222,0.01121928,0.005536366,0.5328295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001733743,0.000539246,0.05816762,0.0001628444,0.000165997,0.01045252,0.005001261,0.8481292,0.05114851,0.008086879,0.01783026,0.0001421939],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6885648,0.0004100457,0.3014901,0.001429524,0.0001229754,0.0001629399,0.0009522358,0.00184528,0.005022117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7981728,0.0001284038,0.2004723,0.00004387161,0.00004037981,0.00002126629,0.0003158553,0.0001861436,0.0006190496],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005407551,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01771814,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03107485645528433,"score_gpt":0.27241772667345,"score_spread":0.2413428702181657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}