{"id":"W2504661623","doi":"10.1190/int-2016-0036.1","title":"A case study showing the value of multioffset synthetic seismograms in seismic data interpretation","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Interpretation","topic":"Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Penn West Exploration (Canada); University of Calgary","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Seismogram; Synthetic seismogram; Amplitude versus offset; Geology; Seismology; Amplitude; Offset (computer science); Reflection coefficient; Anelastic attenuation factor; Seismic survey; Synthetic data; Reflection (computer programming); Cretaceous; S-wave; Poisson distribution; Geodesy; Seismic wave; Algorithm; Paleontology; Statistics; Optics; Mathematics; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008821634,0.0001116501,0.0001410044,0.0001608687,0.00006341276,0.00003751683,0.0004128042,0.00003883503,0.00009524581],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002591546,0.00006355937,0.00003647604,0.0001955024,0.00009841702,0.0005636832,0.00004379393,0.000101473,0.00003264807],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001326922,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002842166,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01429023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005859683,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986765,0.0003170915,0.000361454,0.0002957944,0.0001983704,0.0001507856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987603,0.0005298283,0.0001377306,0.0004986525,0.00004413164,0.00002936894],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008354647,0.00005640348,0.07904425,0.00001273156,0.00002260517,0.0001060731,0.00750172,0.001242039,0.00009632928,0.000006610956,0.0002753171,0.9115524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003126796,0.0001685684,0.006177229,0.000197266,0.00002821274,0.0002552412,0.006357471,0.9853444,0.0003964379,0.0004690574,0.0001854839,0.000107939],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9474531,0.00006683836,0.05076162,0.0006835802,0.0002519124,0.0003807066,0.0000595991,0.00006043656,0.0002822111],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990283,0.000008921507,0.0004282923,0.0004415397,0.00001657568,0.000004512775,0.0000391439,0.000004523438,0.00002820231],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9841024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9922737,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03107485645528433,"score_gpt":0.27241772667345,"score_spread":0.2413428702181657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}