{"id":"W2504850934","doi":"10.1080/02786826.2016.1219691","title":"Assessing the accuracy of complex refractive index retrievals from single aerosol particle cavity ring-down spectroscopy","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Aerosol Science and Technology","topic":"Atmospheric aerosols and clouds","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Natural Environment Research Council; Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Bristol","keywords":"Aerosol; Cavity ring-down spectroscopy; Refractive index; Particle (ecology); RADIUS; Optics; Spectroscopy; Mie scattering; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Absorption (acoustics); Chemistry; Molecular physics; Materials science; Laser; Scattering; Light scattering; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002595152,0.0003743418,0.0003164668,0.0007173195,0.000385613,0.0009300808,0.0007408614,0.0005242152,0.0009044402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008560649,0.0002796345,0.000238884,0.0003749291,0.0008633721,0.001122706,0.000838199,0.0005574389,0.0003151039],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006199991,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004009217,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003444419,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004702874,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989163,0.0001779426,0.00005349934,0.0003557305,0.0004159621,0.00008069281],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997444,0.001272587,0.0003867351,0.0005291636,0.0003332683,0.0000343097],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005430077,0.00009453137,0.02963247,0.0001909439,0.0001288332,0.00009330396,0.0004217074,0.02243446,0.8817456,0.003893957,0.0005675026,0.06025366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004387978,0.0002337551,0.03262713,0.00003725012,0.0000568635,0.000166613,0.0001458885,0.2697648,0.6931012,0.001980397,0.001733593,0.0001086848],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.919482,0.0004844042,0.07500631,0.0001125782,0.00006263232,0.00005296995,0.0004825723,0.0004966843,0.003819967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9486532,0.0002629511,0.05003545,0.00003911463,0.00001504461,0.00003059237,0.0002522042,0.00007471393,0.000636761],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003444419,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01372468,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02153058731608734,"score_gpt":0.2874072221213347,"score_spread":0.2658766348052474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}