{"id":"W2504850934","doi":"10.1080/02786826.2016.1219691","title":"Assessing the accuracy of complex refractive index retrievals from single aerosol particle cavity ring-down spectroscopy","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Aerosol Science and Technology","topic":"Atmospheric aerosols and clouds","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Natural Environment Research Council; Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Bristol","keywords":"Aerosol; Cavity ring-down spectroscopy; Refractive index; Particle (ecology); RADIUS; Optics; Spectroscopy; Mie scattering; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Absorption (acoustics); Chemistry; Molecular physics; Materials science; Laser; Scattering; Light scattering; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005912891,0.0001799183,0.0002513194,0.000006893067,0.0006029066,0.0001026048,0.0008077667,0.000133236,0.0005187886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008632194,0.0001029355,0.00003218007,0.001363255,0.005602126,0.0009221865,0.0007792059,0.0001852444,0.00006428861],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002102656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006848836,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006911632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000138369,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978844,0.00004554787,0.0003090224,0.0006168777,0.0005724893,0.0005716516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985868,0.0003021256,0.0003029133,0.0006380656,0.00006267049,0.0001074558],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008734315,0.00006105434,0.1137568,8.676604e-7,0.000004636201,0.000002176683,0.0001006835,0.000001993796,0.8666308,0.0001742766,0.00009321689,0.01916478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003769134,0.0001917406,0.08220472,0.00002623869,0.00001356857,0.000009276448,0.0006609735,0.000481704,0.9135371,0.002037663,0.0002714854,0.0001885594],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9907287,0.00004915863,0.002754036,0.004333955,0.00008392881,0.0002241549,0.000006793282,0.00008366727,0.001735599],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978029,0.0000371305,0.001837773,0.0002081287,0.00002312771,0.00001456995,3.73493e-7,0.00001054037,0.00006551771],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04690639,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997104,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02153058731608734,"score_gpt":0.2874072221213347,"score_spread":0.2658766348052474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}