{"id":"W2505001007","doi":"10.1007/s10018-019-00254-6","title":"Survival of the cleanest? Evidence from a plant-level analysis of pollutant emissions in Canadian pulp and paper industry, 2005–2013","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Economics and Policy Studies","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Government of Canada; University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Pollutant; Greenhouse gas; Environmental science; Pulp (tooth); Natural resource economics; Production (economics); Emission intensity; Economics; Environmental engineering; Environmental economics; Agricultural economics; Engineering; Ecology; Microeconomics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002569898,0.0001671976,0.0003892517,0.00009541919,0.00008924297,0.000008970113,0.0001627742,0.0001075367,0.0005507201],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004102706,0.0001299678,0.00007321947,0.0001330227,0.0006323425,0.0001808553,0.0004249224,0.0001483783,0.000006611179],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005925091,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003211002,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3645788,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4086812,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989029,0.00006494351,0.0003268135,0.0002959241,0.0000908514,0.000318569],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992473,0.0001401049,0.0001327872,0.000292823,6.155733e-7,0.0001863532],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001523567,0.00003223318,0.9944915,0.000005679032,0.0001537801,6.007543e-7,0.001993537,0.001258541,0.001407296,0.00004247832,0.00002477351,0.0005743902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001894183,0.00003089533,0.9935651,0.00001757455,0.00008525979,0.000001019366,0.003818119,0.0006954951,0.0002090772,0.0002056329,0.001049844,0.0001325989],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9962703,0.0006338979,8.963129e-8,0.00184533,0.00003550372,0.0002100441,0.000744579,0.000001262988,0.0002589741],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939541,0.005463906,0.00002173424,0.0002070937,0.00001102924,0.000004932282,0.000006437765,0.000008210754,0.000322595],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04410237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6396526,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02551104968291834,"score_gpt":0.2586745769035592,"score_spread":0.2331635272206409,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}