{"id":"W2505079813","doi":"10.1139/cjfr-2016-0132","title":"Cost to produce carbon credits through fluctuating harvest levels in British Columbia, Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Baseline (sea); Carbon fibers; Carbon sequestration; Environmental science; Carbon credit; Production (economics); Forest inventory; Agricultural economics; Forestry; Greenhouse gas; Agricultural science; Agroforestry; Forest management; Mathematics; Geography; Economics; Carbon dioxide; Biology; Ecology; Fishery","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007785069,0.0002479375,0.0002203734,0.001024437,0.001868002,0.00228428,0.001086169,0.0002781309,0.00292599],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002802331,0.0002788616,0.0001790141,0.002833988,0.000766772,0.0004611909,0.000558266,0.0004936497,0.0001922961],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03711176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01819502,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9786907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9929237,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992844,0.00009023288,0.00003249768,0.00008157647,0.0002993974,0.0002119059],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986412,0.0003076304,0.0001380416,0.0000869357,0.0005107337,0.000315442],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001168328,0.0003221643,0.7451011,0.000160013,0.0001774305,0.001267349,0.001190907,0.07011594,0.005705918,0.003722344,0.006181217,0.1648873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000520827,0.000182287,0.9523311,0.00005131564,0.00007021231,0.0002084663,0.002465524,0.03455225,0.001395646,0.0006241618,0.00799845,0.00006835919],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9895051,0.0002003378,0.0004614711,0.0001355357,0.000004105966,0.00006193569,0.001636328,0.00003431326,0.007960857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956553,0.0001400679,0.0007187865,0.00001639914,7.055977e-7,0.00001414323,0.0006742136,0.000008153816,0.002772322],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03711176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2692659,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06248939435398002,"score_gpt":0.3013894163160109,"score_spread":0.2389000219620309,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}