{"id":"W2505338331","doi":"10.1002/jcc.24452","title":"Design of [2]rotaxane through image threshold segmentation of electrostatic potential image","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Computational Chemistry","topic":"Supramolecular Chemistry and Complexes","field":"Chemistry","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Education and Child Care","funders":"Nanjing University; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Rotaxane; Image (mathematics); Artificial intelligence; Image segmentation; Computer vision; Segmentation; Chemistry; Computer science; Pattern recognition (psychology); Materials science; Supramolecular chemistry; Molecule; Organic chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001591095,0.000344784,0.000291234,0.0002403954,0.0001368113,0.0003275115,0.000396329,0.0002066249,0.001257529],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002275299,0.0002168738,0.0001973112,0.0002173951,0.0001870246,0.0003480575,0.0002570934,0.0002859533,0.0003328593],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002454743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003020154,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002629992,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004111783,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9999127,0.00001149773,0.00000705403,0.00003110254,0.00002314152,0.00001452249],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9999264,0.000012929,0.0000210316,0.000008266466,0.0000168925,0.00001449709],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001406935,0.0000615739,0.0003566454,0.0001827003,0.00001923973,0.0001452581,0.00005509094,0.03334125,0.9225681,0.004255354,0.0003489645,0.0385252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006103609,0.0006498694,0.000756775,0.00001310958,0.00002709851,0.0002479293,0.00003883085,0.3592929,0.6315247,0.001214797,0.006126286,0.00004667516],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4424735,0.0007232157,0.5479182,0.0001355077,0.00006744195,0.0003367685,0.0002036854,0.00139212,0.0067496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6981475,0.0003341501,0.2989888,0.00004472235,0.000007287736,0.0002743776,0.0002268835,0.0001315489,0.001844591],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.001257529,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.004206896,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01151926817499227,"score_gpt":0.2513466693976082,"score_spread":0.2398274012226159,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}