{"id":"W2505885145","doi":"10.54648/eulr2016025","title":"Ethnographic Methods in the Study of Hybrid Processes in Arbitration: the Chinese and Western Perspectives","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Business Law Review","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Ethnography; Arbitration; Adversarial system; Context (archaeology); Interpretation (philosophy); Perspective (graphical); Sociology; Epistemology; Order (exchange); Political science; Law and economics; Law; Economics; Computer science; Geography; Linguistics; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01621637,0.0005950113,0.0005472456,0.005677071,0.003871312,0.003866049,0.001143125,0.001037961,0.003139212],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01099849,0.000330109,0.0002789177,0.008970024,0.01617881,0.005767439,0.004537365,0.001095359,0.0001546707],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003524566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003145164,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01683534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02320119,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9892374,0.009383411,0.0002748604,0.0003033956,0.0004806611,0.0003202715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9768281,0.02032567,0.0008713557,0.001053722,0.0005144587,0.0004066213],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005476017,0.0001113895,0.0125752,0.0007766311,0.00002876503,0.0009851803,0.6923246,0.0004458673,0.0009607076,0.2226053,0.001493948,0.06763762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004556301,0.0001427587,0.03012158,0.001800662,0.00006392282,0.0009608419,0.790599,0.002759696,0.001315289,0.09177002,0.0803407,0.0000799581],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6703302,0.03301303,0.1097318,0.01255132,0.0004347566,0.001430896,0.0003656823,0.00009650258,0.1720458],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9646201,0.008698626,0.01909569,0.0008128497,0.0001544566,0.001072182,0.00008193465,0.00002028222,0.005443932],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01683534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08576137,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0370693859037562,"score_gpt":0.3175081074986337,"score_spread":0.2804387215948775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}