{"id":"W2506400836","doi":"10.5006/c2016-07573","title":"Methodology for Threat Assessment and Mitigation Planning for Pipeline Integrity","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Information and Cyber Security","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Stantec (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Integrity management; Pipeline (software); Computer science; Reliability engineering; Forensic engineering; Environmental science; Risk analysis (engineering); Petroleum engineering; Systems engineering; Construction engineering; Engineering; Business","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008134171,0.001666114,0.000689169,0.006246339,0.001763037,0.003667449,0.002515319,0.001798234,0.01206341],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02049289,0.0009551752,0.002317524,0.002418072,0.001356776,0.002269837,0.003499246,0.0016099,0.002223187],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002384696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006029977,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005168089,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005718861,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9942411,0.002547118,0.0005764131,0.000556619,0.001789964,0.0002888748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9883597,0.004957699,0.001169857,0.001124206,0.004080533,0.0003080812],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000964131,0.0002860928,0.00518382,0.001376575,0.0002274147,0.001274133,0.001845633,0.3008207,0.009720567,0.1829107,0.009614575,0.4866434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000540421,0.000231168,0.001265049,0.0006075059,0.0001367737,0.0006678325,0.001174582,0.7970136,0.008628959,0.1381649,0.05196004,0.00009548521],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.001664754,0.00007162319,0.9935962,0.0001680894,0.00002019801,0.0005884311,0.0001529425,0.0004996691,0.003238131],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0324815,0.00009979119,0.9651217,0.00004021123,0.00001311102,0.0006013755,0.0002667735,0.00006477523,0.00131079],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01206341,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0430181,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1149179899369921,"score_gpt":0.3982676011538182,"score_spread":0.2833496112168261,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}