{"id":"W2507160277","doi":"10.18352/ijc.634","title":"Explaining success and failure in the commons: the configural nature of Ostrom's institutional design principles","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of the Commons","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":208,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Commons; Common-pool resource; Natural resource; Qualitative comparative analysis; Corporate governance; Interdependence; Business; Environmental resource management; Environmental economics; Economics; Ecology; Computer science; Political science; Microeconomics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007192073,0.00007066905,0.00008012186,0.00004420814,0.0001911203,0.00004607239,0.001245289,0.00003753783,0.00009721248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000147631,0.00002826555,0.00006683879,0.00009120473,0.0003706785,0.0001583039,0.0003794514,0.0002231552,0.000003003232],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008566177,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002203225,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001075105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008059272,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988887,0.0002058482,0.0002309378,0.00006859312,0.0005228671,0.00008310884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991055,0.0004330183,0.000256939,0.0001392193,0.00004428304,0.00002107024],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008161319,0.00007238354,0.9881221,0.000002148324,0.0000769295,0.00001640719,0.001567958,0.001737279,0.001000311,0.003097918,0.001923497,0.002301454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005187721,0.00002762208,0.9687572,0.00009742991,0.00001854621,0.00009491366,0.0009147581,0.000147165,0.0003151222,0.0007468013,0.02831208,0.00004957633],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9421635,0.00007483628,0.0006264138,0.05545326,0.0002400365,0.0001179264,0.00001341098,0.000002073936,0.001308544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991786,0.0000269556,0.0001347859,0.0005279092,0.00004928956,0.000001799831,6.006843e-7,0.000001963636,0.00007806079],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05701514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2314078,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02532599585831723,"score_gpt":0.2368363240096348,"score_spread":0.2115103281513176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}