{"id":"W2507324678","doi":"","title":"Private Party Access to the Competition Tribunal: A Critical Evaluation of the Section 103.1 Experiment","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Merger and Competition Analysis","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Competition (biology); Section (typography); Order (exchange); Law; Perspective (graphical); Business; Political science; Advertising; Finance; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08563786,0.0008467174,0.001866955,0.00130324,0.008839255,0.008314925,0.003443599,0.01241347,0.02713395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.179064,0.0008434533,0.001581301,0.001516349,0.01430637,0.01065865,0.005194607,0.01088361,0.002183933],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008919284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008864435,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01197975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01095046,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9332626,0.04266785,0.001863715,0.005144061,0.01194889,0.005112884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5658535,0.3934728,0.01224286,0.01525352,0.01081743,0.002359841],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.02384932,0.01556141,0.005861163,0.001017002,0.0006108174,0.0007521207,0.01609792,0.003641679,0.003661865,0.8236345,0.05901105,0.04630113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.03728609,0.0291266,0.02799491,0.001216629,0.002467378,0.0002636198,0.02653409,0.02117598,0.01976509,0.5732341,0.2601969,0.000738619],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.605085,0.001361174,0.02137666,0.04975559,0.002271572,0.008861334,0.001645848,0.0003102068,0.3093327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9300792,0.0005212463,0.006369763,0.02651693,0.001146258,0.008022238,0.0002417148,0.0001324314,0.02697027],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9910807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4529017,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1024182646084926,"score_gpt":0.3516379735212946,"score_spread":0.249219708912802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}