{"id":"W2507329416","doi":"10.1097/ajp.0000000000000406","title":"Psychometric Properties of the Numerical Rating Scale to Assess Self-Reported Pain Intensity in Children and Adolescents","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Clinical Journal of Pain","topic":"Pediatric Pain Management Techniques","field":"Medicine","cited_by":307,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"PsycINFO; Rating scale; CINAHL; Clinical psychology; Reliability (semiconductor); Strengths and weaknesses; Psychometrics; MEDLINE; Medicine; Scale (ratio); Physical therapy; Psychology; Psychiatry; Developmental psychology; Social psychology; Psychological intervention","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02650005,0.0003185658,0.002699885,0.000742843,0.00003255089,0.00002089757,0.0005168483,0.0003479451,0.000004982028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01876743,0.0001617894,0.0007609082,0.001290461,0.0001332723,0.00006423533,0.0002909591,0.001269203,0.000002655127],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001591935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003471518,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00000653464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":8.454456e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9921151,0.003215266,0.003368181,0.0003653467,0.0006499838,0.0002861599],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954083,0.0009566121,0.002515758,0.0005108193,0.000335989,0.0002725483],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005024926,0.000390828,0.5121033,0.002589959,0.0002741447,0.00001322767,0.00001047199,2.585098e-8,0.000001863772,2.049853e-7,0.002423496,0.4821423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002556224,0.001882197,0.7149198,0.2052755,0.003767111,0.0005098997,0.00004209001,0.00004130246,0.000005361382,0.00005350042,0.07028327,0.0006637229],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.03396109,0.9552787,0.006923215,0.0005952179,0.0003620878,0.002781047,0.000005003679,0.00006176433,0.00003184694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05064977,0.9451068,0.002625789,0.0009181756,0.0006184577,0.00001272002,0.000001359978,0.00004257097,0.00002435135],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4814786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9894979,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1072593506379471,"score_gpt":0.4069423542752362,"score_spread":0.2996830036372891,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}