{"id":"W2509245295","doi":"10.1111/bju.13653","title":"The landscape of systematic reviews in urology (1998 to 2015): an assessment of methodological quality","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Urology","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Systematic review; Medicine; Urology; MEDLINE","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.6244326,0.002398372,0.01275772,0.07310786,0.003206515,0.0163727,0.006476501,0.005805008,0.002020984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.8422,0.004263582,0.01744639,0.07996579,0.007414035,0.01627328,0.01181416,0.004644854,0.0004494896],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02587256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04096357,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010001,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02391046,"domain_scores_codex":[0.2002545,0.3589272,0.3422877,0.02403976,0.07188025,0.002610698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.08080503,0.6058459,0.2283327,0.02066587,0.06087412,0.003476327],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001314527,0.00008941359,0.08133988,0.7248127,0.07040735,0.0004861734,0.008818761,0.001204147,0.000764113,0.005720435,0.007506377,0.09753606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007945788,0.001110322,0.1378991,0.7332724,0.05758603,0.001947728,0.005591451,0.002261946,0.0008169115,0.008437607,0.04987674,0.0004051973],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01702677,0.9472844,0.009817894,0.01388378,0.001241568,0.003339287,0.005873831,0.0001156659,0.001416789],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3618908,0.4817301,0.09558368,0.01371371,0.001939891,0.03480436,0.009658271,0.000247977,0.0004311375],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3755674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4631416,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.7887582492137941,"score_gpt":0.6119582787909439,"score_spread":0.1767999704228502,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}