{"id":"W2509288248","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.08.054","title":"Statistical performance of a multicomparison method for generalized species diversity indices under realistic empirical scenarios","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Indicators","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Species evenness; Quadrat; Species richness; Statistical hypothesis testing; Statistics; Ecology; Relative abundance distribution; Type I and type II errors; Diversity index; Species diversity; Entropy (arrow of time); Diversity (politics); Abundance (ecology); Mathematics; Econometrics; Computer science; Biology; Relative species abundance; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004944567,0.0001424001,0.000326394,0.0000657022,0.0004342993,0.00000590324,0.0002610953,0.0001664657,0.002373606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003958936,0.00008676009,0.00006999196,0.0001608066,0.000796364,0.00008513423,0.0005055905,0.0001011723,0.00008698463],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000173863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001473118,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002900966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002451581,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998651,0.0001656392,0.0003173868,0.0003408356,0.0002031095,0.0003220599],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998019,0.001525347,0.0002037118,0.0001266508,0.00001362924,0.000111594],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000109014,0.0002542835,0.9920118,0.00001377504,0.00004295118,0.000001758022,0.0002473023,0.000518535,0.0002858585,0.003907117,0.001640706,0.0009668731],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007433249,0.0003731448,0.9897956,0.000004884168,0.00005626969,0.00000122052,0.00006566618,0.005752936,0.0001730104,0.002360624,0.0005314135,0.0001419223],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9511816,0.00000648599,0.04681206,0.0007063,0.0001022674,0.0002779032,0.00006415309,0.00003292269,0.0008163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9673458,0.00003239682,0.03184814,0.0003194701,0.00001934125,0.00004242723,0.00000951863,0.000005727148,0.0003772285],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01616414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985384,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04713054498319554,"score_gpt":0.3232926141368937,"score_spread":0.2761620691536982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}