{"id":"W2509365102","doi":"10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.08.004","title":"Analyzing electronic word of mouth: A social commerce construct","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Information Management","topic":"Digital Marketing and Social Media","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":166,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Construct (python library); Social commerce; Product (mathematics); Latent semantic analysis; Service (business); Reading (process); Social media; Marketing; E-commerce; Thematic analysis; Psychology; Business; Knowledge management; Computer science; World Wide Web; Sociology; Political science; Information retrieval; Qualitative research","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002561823,0.0004287541,0.0002933535,0.007852864,0.001044859,0.004286687,0.0003684016,0.0009028715,0.002465194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02367827,0.0001873555,0.0004383043,0.005614339,0.001232945,0.005299763,0.001850571,0.0008104336,0.0004983411],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008293205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008361386,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001637623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002073062,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970246,0.001270222,0.0003734969,0.0002547512,0.0009208314,0.00015605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9641638,0.02385471,0.006876552,0.0009720561,0.003253911,0.0008789378],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004906364,0.00067122,0.8255322,0.0006373012,0.00022962,0.0004022595,0.02534028,0.0009216734,0.01259529,0.01443418,0.002164004,0.1165815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004081508,0.0007073272,0.8689375,0.0003470537,0.0003899389,0.001169874,0.06712604,0.0239909,0.007729695,0.01330334,0.01610049,0.0001570106],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9847535,0.0002737292,0.005015015,0.000293298,0.0000277576,0.00011165,0.0005904256,0.00004024765,0.008894371],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993292,0.000129635,0.0049994,0.00005713735,0.00004795931,0.00008983259,0.000534412,0.00002299941,0.0008267476],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.007852864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01354837,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009895525117685749,"score_gpt":0.2892606044081616,"score_spread":0.2793650792904758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}