{"id":"W2510880950","doi":"10.5131/ajcl.2015.0020","title":"Revisiting Qúebec's <I>Jus Commune</I> in the Era of the Human Rights Charters","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Charter; Political science; Civil code; Human rights; Doctrine; Civil law (Civil law); Fundamental rights; International human rights law; Public law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002748432,0.0001749493,0.0006396534,0.00002388113,0.001541571,0.0000908065,0.001460328,0.00002362014,0.0000178313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005681282,0.0000741959,0.0002216925,0.0005465082,0.004098279,0.0002411144,0.0001191897,0.0006010276,0.00000880331],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001933939,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000714915,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003142301,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007907863,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9949183,0.003168404,0.0005769217,0.0001039497,0.0009100247,0.0003223404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970443,0.000843793,0.001304202,0.0002770692,0.0004408683,0.000089777],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001304668,0.0001511131,0.002455636,0.000006433088,0.0002771775,0.000009870062,0.6751123,0.0002456362,0.002575974,0.311636,0.006401048,0.00099831],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002609656,0.001246973,0.2101095,0.0009259264,0.0003435273,0.00005344086,0.3229536,0.0001019318,0.001018881,0.03669214,0.4231223,0.0008221642],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9618514,0.0008550849,0.000009034787,0.01429092,0.0001503,0.0002725955,0.000003543638,0.000007100553,0.02256003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987976,0.00003359574,0.00009723918,0.0005874416,0.0003739528,0.000005554954,4.004259e-7,0.00000560354,0.00009863803],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4167213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997583,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06187720364674588,"score_gpt":0.35406543297975,"score_spread":0.2921882293330041,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}