{"id":"W2511142278","doi":"10.1093/jof/101.2.48","title":"Market and Resource Impacts of a Canadian Lumber Tariff","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forestry","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tariff; Revenue; Softwood; Agricultural economics; Resource (disambiguation); Business; Offset (computer science); Natural resource economics; Economic impact analysis; Economics; International trade; Pulp and paper industry; Engineering; Finance","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001460996,0.0002829164,0.000472884,0.001031062,0.003350541,0.004900615,0.001305127,0.002502433,0.01889722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005258113,0.0003010581,0.0007081159,0.001079004,0.00179873,0.001313666,0.0008539403,0.001780289,0.0004848306],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.048306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02715108,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9626461,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9864237,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988874,0.00009954086,0.00001856258,0.00007395781,0.0004434216,0.0004771566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971313,0.001094817,0.0002504092,0.00006211364,0.001007269,0.0004539115],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.009564232,0.003373026,0.1907744,0.0003931572,0.0003249145,0.0036304,0.005730164,0.07377392,0.01503431,0.495128,0.1065933,0.09568023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001099056,0.0009637713,0.6765229,0.000170708,0.000918948,0.0003061987,0.02233145,0.09117263,0.005026433,0.06472624,0.1362753,0.0004863722],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8754696,0.0004805329,0.0002550354,0.006834836,0.00005930958,0.0000546,0.000986952,0.0000248513,0.1158342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9816598,0.0002514266,0.0001193643,0.0004107601,0.00002938781,0.000009064779,0.0001797727,0.00001196947,0.0173285],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.048306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3504862,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.006331662903287467,"score_gpt":0.2043949987571526,"score_spread":0.1980633358538652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}