{"id":"W2511142278","doi":"10.1093/jof/101.2.48","title":"Market and Resource Impacts of a Canadian Lumber Tariff","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forestry","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tariff; Revenue; Softwood; Agricultural economics; Resource (disambiguation); Business; Offset (computer science); Natural resource economics; Economic impact analysis; Economics; International trade; Pulp and paper industry; Engineering; Finance","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003281273,0.00006424139,0.0001062021,0.00015294,0.00003759821,0.00001531127,0.0001497851,0.00004314738,0.003304274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001241597,0.00005242438,0.00004315819,0.0002189997,0.00009806765,0.0001387417,0.00003444797,0.0001118738,0.0000246026],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005301136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003495135,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02293017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02205653,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993689,0.00003167808,0.0001948089,0.00005554589,0.0001669643,0.0001821233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994475,0.00002090697,0.0001519688,0.0001290564,0.000005756933,0.0002448429],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001805759,0.00001692136,0.5904899,0.00001175906,0.00001829354,0.00004321624,0.0001950758,0.00007566841,0.0001078954,0.0005383826,0.4079249,0.0005598815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003262979,0.00009496092,0.5134588,0.0000269206,0.00002085091,0.0001248997,0.00004567709,0.00004192032,0.0001171559,0.001055978,0.4846102,0.00007630049],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7429369,0.00005926282,9.311912e-7,0.0003116851,0.00003447491,0.00002922672,0.000001677755,0.000001022462,0.2566248],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951142,0.000048163,0.0006575755,0.0002064599,0.00003355993,2.248801e-7,2.389554e-7,0.000006160043,0.003933388],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2526914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976068,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.006331662903287467,"score_gpt":0.2043949987571526,"score_spread":0.1980633358538652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}