{"id":"W2512587292","doi":"10.1186/s13643-016-0310-9","title":"Eliciting women’s cervical screening preferences: a mixed methods systematic review protocol","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Systematic Reviews","topic":"Cervical Cancer and HPV Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Hospital; Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue; University of Ottawa","funders":"Mitacs; University of Ottawa","keywords":"Medicine; Protocol (science); Systematic review; Family medicine; Obstetrics; MEDLINE; Gynecology; Alternative medicine; Pathology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.02101183,0.0005101555,0.005685459,0.0001665092,0.0001252306,0.00007369716,0.0005439219,0.0001448657,0.004562017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02117214,0.0002123336,0.0006750925,0.0006963914,0.00007956722,0.0001609955,0.0001906552,0.0003079696,0.001098119],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004728222,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001674989,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001192069,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005266088,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9864926,0.006779257,0.004069909,0.000654802,0.0011932,0.0008101704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937762,0.002137529,0.001259326,0.0016796,0.0005333347,0.0006139998],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003040655,0.00005400846,0.00002385754,0.976981,0.0001495409,0.000008326548,0.0001682155,9.751097e-9,0.0001005676,0.0001215502,0.0006548411,0.02170767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001245727,0.0003058556,0.00007565766,0.9892969,0.0007198916,0.0001739815,0.0002493066,0.00005837811,0.00008785869,0.000329302,0.007118757,0.0003384048],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"protocol","genre_gemma":"protocol","genre_scores_codex":[0.00004844219,0.02830946,0.04193774,0.001064098,0.0001325231,0.9154119,0.000007331006,0.0002160905,0.01287245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001848961,0.001815132,0.01053786,0.001553056,0.0002072984,0.9822891,0.000003320766,0.00006761666,0.001677594],"genre_candidate":"protocol","genre_consensus":"protocol","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0668773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996796,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1422207947970027,"score_gpt":0.4802177256101848,"score_spread":0.3379969308131822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}