{"id":"W2512587292","doi":"10.1186/s13643-016-0310-9","title":"Eliciting women’s cervical screening preferences: a mixed methods systematic review protocol","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Systematic Reviews","topic":"Cervical Cancer and HPV Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Hospital; Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue; University of Ottawa","funders":"Mitacs; University of Ottawa","keywords":"Medicine; Protocol (science); Systematic review; Family medicine; Obstetrics; MEDLINE; Gynecology; Alternative medicine; Pathology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1823207,0.006618646,0.01423698,0.0194232,0.006145689,0.008807541,0.007986468,0.009771595,0.07475262],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1513791,0.008180869,0.01300085,0.01666323,0.00566588,0.009338608,0.00679415,0.008374979,0.01285469],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0197018,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1017514,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007583827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01741732,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9021978,0.05338081,0.02577884,0.00571733,0.009039693,0.003885454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8917588,0.05078897,0.01346374,0.0111702,0.02800082,0.004817508],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01177965,0.001188489,0.001640238,0.8017829,0.002851179,0.001481485,0.01227491,0.002762971,0.002302221,0.01204319,0.04630915,0.1035836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.05050433,0.004776288,0.007839094,0.5919765,0.01016448,0.000930158,0.01373758,0.004078365,0.005370985,0.02500231,0.2845733,0.001046489],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"protocol","genre_gemma":"protocol","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002212752,0.0005199661,0.001282547,0.0001875377,0.00006768333,0.9962336,0.00119886,0.00004526346,0.0002433352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0001617081,0.0002458155,0.002663437,0.00006859918,0.000005144202,0.9966704,0.0001131684,0.00000323591,0.00006841462],"genre_candidate":"protocol","genre_consensus":"protocol","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1823207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9642157,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1422207947970027,"score_gpt":0.4802177256101848,"score_spread":0.3379969308131822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}