{"id":"W2512922897","doi":"10.1093/annonc/mdw322","title":"Effect of dose adjustment on the safety and efficacy of afatinib for EGFR mutation-positive lung adenocarcinoma: post hoc analyses of the randomized LUX-Lung 3 and 6 trials","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annals of Oncology","topic":"Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations","field":"Medicine","cited_by":188,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Afatinib; Medicine; Internal medicine; Lung cancer; Adenocarcinoma; Adverse effect; Pharmacokinetics; Oncology; Gastroenterology; Post-hoc analysis; Incidence (geometry); Chemotherapy; Urology; Pharmacology; Surgery; Cancer; Epidermal growth factor receptor; Erlotinib","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01164824,0.002887171,0.006903743,0.0004859841,0.0005105842,0.00237279,0.00163945,0.002528859,0.007190332],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01810872,0.0009879007,0.01241733,0.0005736415,0.001456646,0.003570955,0.0008818742,0.007106044,0.0008261116],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009858744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001075265,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007975233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001203762,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9874316,0.00927151,0.0008053837,0.001307701,0.000387831,0.0007959256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9878759,0.008618937,0.001370087,0.001282964,0.0003587096,0.0004933741],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"randomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.9790326,0.0004456433,0.0009239599,0.0003434187,0.01086155,0.00003589808,0.00003993858,0.0009936333,0.0008356908,0.0001036932,0.0005528065,0.005831075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.8314791,0.09628339,0.0195619,0.0001204071,0.03639352,0.0001835516,0.0001601358,0.006736718,0.003783355,0.002488944,0.002612323,0.0001967516],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9796287,0.00819101,0.002343317,0.001120654,0.001252776,0.001254277,0.001931264,0.000295693,0.003982171],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942799,0.0007477112,0.001112104,0.0005469597,0.0002209489,0.0005730643,0.0006309327,0.00008084546,0.001807548],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01164824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06160253,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06141598778247197,"score_gpt":0.4621472999199842,"score_spread":0.4007313121375122,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}