{"id":"W2513207392","doi":"10.1002/cjce.22622","title":"CSChE chemical spill environmental/ecological risk assessment guideline development","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering","topic":"Risk and Safety Analysis","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Public Safety Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Guideline; Scope (computer science); Credibility; Stakeholder; Process (computing); Business; Risk analysis (engineering); Government (linguistics); Product (mathematics); Risk assessment; Environmental resource management; Chemical industry; Environmental planning; Environmental science; Engineering; Environmental economics; Computer science; Environmental engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02562981,0.001886278,0.001019061,0.007207761,0.003735791,0.004267894,0.008632882,0.006816065,0.007110708],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03359298,0.001183788,0.002074386,0.00434459,0.00211612,0.0012839,0.002647263,0.003748569,0.00356663],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03202913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.173587,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6704206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8124267,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9684284,0.00440084,0.002506216,0.0006078838,0.02240713,0.00164962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9220224,0.00671551,0.002627055,0.001553631,0.06496167,0.002119687],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001770207,0.0009937716,0.006106993,0.002524739,0.00006441012,0.001367168,0.00141348,0.0201234,0.009750775,0.04066476,0.7452734,0.1715401],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001485826,0.0002059989,0.009409596,0.003815494,0.0001006536,0.0003000536,0.000809163,0.005906454,0.005990214,0.00469494,0.9684701,0.0001488151],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.02675944,0.007652594,0.1302616,0.08250694,0.002979875,0.0376042,0.03875363,0.002762831,0.6707188],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10806,0.01309214,0.5128403,0.0369413,0.0004963868,0.01517545,0.04458715,0.0003953138,0.2684119],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6704206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6630408,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02633048697660601,"score_gpt":0.2738052305149885,"score_spread":0.2474747435383825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}