{"id":"W2513483272","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21139","title":"Pronghorn habitat suitability in the Texas Panhandle","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Resources Conservation Service; Canadian Natural Resources Limited; Texas Tech University; Texas Parks and Wildlife Department","keywords":"Habitat; Geography; Ecology; Forestry; Physical geography; Environmental science; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002435605,0.0001579475,0.0001295936,0.0005819313,0.0003758945,0.000560469,0.0002137895,0.0001520671,0.002312918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006029981,0.00009713819,0.0001874266,0.0006304657,0.0002680907,0.0003713796,0.0004165148,0.0001166251,0.0001009722],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006732377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003867716,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06022758,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1347139,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9999061,0.00002417,0.000005691272,0.00002754268,0.00001643518,0.00002001544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997401,0.0001005227,0.00008588562,0.0000115011,0.00003213072,0.00002977949],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007980431,0.00005417682,0.964734,0.00008592663,0.00008634179,0.0005446974,0.0005722521,0.0173935,0.002201303,0.0004486855,0.0006697579,0.01312943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001041458,0.00008565615,0.9673957,0.0000310171,0.00003196533,0.0003094405,0.001732191,0.02812994,0.0002751654,0.0004206085,0.001566617,0.0000112788],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.998291,0.00008479133,0.0003047201,0.0000332342,0.000001016764,0.000006127736,0.0002359004,0.000008083691,0.001035141],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991978,0.0000637384,0.0002848287,0.000008621465,0.000001171215,0.000005730097,0.0002194723,0.000002289676,0.0002163604],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06022758,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.119754,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01072717946780282,"score_gpt":0.2236901290577188,"score_spread":0.2129629495899159,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}