{"id":"W2513607585","doi":"10.1016/j.envpol.2016.08.012","title":"Selection of an appropriate management strategy for contaminated sediment: A case study at a shallow contaminated harbour in Quebec, Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Pollution","topic":"Heavy metals in environment","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Concordia University","keywords":"Environmental science; Contamination; Sediment; Aquatic ecosystem; Environmental remediation; Harbour; Benthic zone; Pollution; Water quality; Environmental engineering; Environmental chemistry; Ecology; Geology; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006229173,0.0005638263,0.0004090025,0.0008291791,0.01145072,0.002249236,0.002145872,0.002383397,0.002119962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001594918,0.0003617609,0.0004643814,0.001797638,0.001733572,0.0004162248,0.001216497,0.001038446,0.0002191493],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03667616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04346555,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9860831,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9969776,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991475,0.0001582379,0.0000233557,0.00005789491,0.000162526,0.0004504384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988374,0.000160466,0.0001010133,0.00002920575,0.0005004847,0.0003714792],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008321651,0.002162456,0.6906577,0.0005906373,0.0003722766,0.1005831,0.03737525,0.02842899,0.01735447,0.004209183,0.01494716,0.1024867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001328433,0.001094643,0.6867414,0.0003938151,0.000254742,0.005480727,0.2510876,0.02385292,0.00315681,0.0009757267,0.02659728,0.000231494],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.993466,0.000160947,0.0006713275,0.001181057,0.0000185625,0.000152159,0.0001703107,0.0000157286,0.0041639],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992486,0.0002512106,0.00162612,0.0002567423,0.000006147619,0.00002633716,0.00008735774,0.00001051536,0.005249434],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03667616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2661054,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009518314684871415,"score_gpt":0.2221615826717802,"score_spread":0.2126432679869088,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}