{"id":"W2513997421","doi":"10.3138/utlj.3609","title":"Quantifying <i>Dunsmuir</i>: An empirical analysis of the Supreme Court of Canada’s jurisprudence on standard of review","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Deference; Standard of review; Law; Jurisprudence; Argument (complex analysis); Voting; Political science; Court of record; Original jurisdiction; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05428312,0.0002043406,0.0006349721,0.009180824,0.0111646,0.01029721,0.002892863,0.002006347,0.002020406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2357145,0.0005712261,0.0005641795,0.01240047,0.01154881,0.004071333,0.003815047,0.004372515,0.0002004042],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1160831,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.107191,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9509236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9640987,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9288954,0.01171043,0.003403702,0.00454321,0.04486687,0.006580396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6407794,0.1792267,0.0600384,0.01161102,0.0950461,0.01329837],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002131435,0.0002327474,0.7382184,0.0003107002,0.0002199243,0.0006704905,0.09624401,0.001875432,0.001411191,0.09227366,0.01198955,0.05634065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000187016,0.00009613478,0.9441215,0.0002591677,0.00005375241,0.0001117323,0.02388064,0.001515074,0.0007386085,0.002454035,0.02660387,0.0001468238],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.932419,0.001668931,0.001575387,0.007874277,0.00005751723,0.0001941101,0.0004607709,0.00003394112,0.05571615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966427,0.0002267938,0.000466915,0.0006582246,0.00001784828,0.00002415885,0.0001126688,0.00001349705,0.001837279],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8839169,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8422461,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04199834323995864,"score_gpt":0.3078332140184926,"score_spread":0.265834870778534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}