{"id":"W2514442695","doi":"10.1109/antem.2016.7550152","title":"The impedance boundary condition implementation for the 3D random auxiliary sources method","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Electromagnetic Scattering and Analysis","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"HFSS; Boundary (topology); Infinitesimal; Electrical impedance; Boundary value problem; Computer science; Flexibility (engineering); Function (biology); Impedance parameters; Mathematical analysis; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Antenna (radio); Microstrip antenna; Engineering; Telecommunications; Electrical engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007285088,0.0005190381,0.0004818412,0.0006462014,0.0003052217,0.001004869,0.001172387,0.0009952304,0.01019548],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001787249,0.0002630783,0.0005601576,0.0004513111,0.0005566295,0.001001292,0.001130534,0.001057617,0.003491716],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003389426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006753242,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008016271,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008055987,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995669,0.0001624965,0.00001797876,0.00002708562,0.0001961414,0.00002946269],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999471,0.0002079037,0.00003493541,0.00008830583,0.0001682871,0.00002967363],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000196139,0.0001339946,0.0007143447,0.0002531117,0.00004692753,0.0004079509,0.0002862366,0.3091983,0.04084129,0.4888971,0.005910381,0.1531143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002303358,0.00002731632,0.00008426982,0.00001986064,0.000005791003,0.00009814272,0.00002735465,0.9639661,0.004972223,0.02184011,0.008919948,0.00001586699],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.001432315,0.00002197977,0.9951997,0.00003357625,0.00001777624,0.00001815877,0.00003624552,0.0002299929,0.00301019],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.146066,0.0001868649,0.8467218,0.0001426951,0.00004892515,0.0002716816,0.0003164349,0.0005780539,0.005667685],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01019548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03410721,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.006779909506938948,"score_gpt":0.3138293820397789,"score_spread":0.30704947253284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}