{"id":"W2514729657","doi":"10.1111/cobi.12809","title":"Feasibility of using high‐resolution satellite imagery to assess vertebrate wildlife populations","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Biology","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":77,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Government of Nunavut","funders":"Government of Nunavut; DigitalGlobe Foundation","keywords":"Wildlife; Geography; Satellite imagery; Remote sensing; Habitat; Environmental resource management; Wildlife conservation; Satellite; Computer science; Ecology; Environmental science; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004489302,0.0001170114,0.0001830967,0.00006803607,0.0001347912,0.000006297297,0.0001484284,0.0001534828,0.0007163241],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004530197,0.00009360923,0.00003706114,0.0003258076,0.0002842064,0.0002389028,0.0001072663,0.00005109304,0.0002003673],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001891444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004728772,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005380041,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009535566,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987374,0.0002574965,0.000359288,0.0003342107,0.00008777635,0.0002238633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991844,0.000187567,0.0002005032,0.0002945296,0.00005959316,0.00007343125],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004510249,0.00003438056,0.9013429,0.000002552901,0.000005340087,3.296701e-7,0.00001819504,0.00008889353,0.09269992,0.003042366,0.00109018,0.001629823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003069021,0.00005825541,0.9896331,0.00001263878,0.00001280068,0.000002582274,0.000007587585,0.0007004926,0.00121495,0.00594913,0.001977786,0.0001237045],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9599885,0.000008428275,0.02879339,0.01032268,0.0003426548,0.000277684,0.00002735995,0.00004144245,0.0001978708],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9882872,0.000008243094,0.007401757,0.004046163,0.00003478089,0.00001829141,0.00003481191,0.000007981896,0.000160736],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09148496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7843246,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.111630570762315,"score_gpt":0.317780172746491,"score_spread":0.206149601984176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}