{"id":"W2514938152","doi":"10.3940/rina.ijme.2016.a2.345","title":"An inherently safer layout design for the liquefaction process of an FLNG plant","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania)","topic":"Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"SAFER; Inherent safety; Process (computing); Scope (computer science); Engineering; Liquefaction; Reliability engineering; Risk analysis (engineering); Engineering design process; Process plant; Deck; Page layout; Liquefied natural gas; Computer science; Computer security; Waste management; Mechanical engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005335329,0.0005980939,0.0003293916,0.0005487893,0.0002601681,0.0007720632,0.0006191842,0.0005086118,0.002334943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000734804,0.0002992969,0.0004334271,0.0002626642,0.0003911449,0.0004075555,0.0004372734,0.0003407677,0.0002648972],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007025992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001131158,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00183398,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00302218,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996319,0.00009134506,0.00002218198,0.00007681535,0.0001415961,0.00003625685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996032,0.00009225767,0.0001146042,0.00004587379,0.0001268061,0.00001725207],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007986861,0.0000781276,0.001677929,0.0002622757,0.00002303772,0.0001823631,0.0001795204,0.8242326,0.07560368,0.007628722,0.0004478002,0.08960415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003193818,0.0005569856,0.001604267,0.000030377,0.00005411687,0.0001976397,0.0001097865,0.9586864,0.03061435,0.002645127,0.005444352,0.00002472319],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0803434,0.0001550539,0.9136868,0.00006231598,0.00001965587,0.000143232,0.00009249136,0.0004930316,0.005004074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4861879,0.0002133537,0.5108674,0.00002691378,0.00000884499,0.0001350487,0.0001459943,0.00006749966,0.002347068],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002334943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.007811189,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01406058188639259,"score_gpt":0.2006499013909515,"score_spread":0.186589319504559,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}