{"id":"W2515120116","doi":"10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b01551","title":"Impact of Vibrational Coherence on the Quantum Yield at a Conical Intersection","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters","topic":"Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft; Max-Planck-Gesellschaft; Joachim Herz Stiftung","keywords":"Conical intersection; Wave packet; Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Conical surface; Physics; Quantum; Excited state; Quantum mechanics; Mathematics; Geometry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006558445,0.0002766425,0.0005052384,0.000401296,0.0007596473,0.0009086473,0.0006318411,0.0004684303,0.001580972],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002387484,0.0002368018,0.0003101504,0.0003511533,0.001550506,0.001183184,0.001160192,0.001018695,0.0001067365],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004959757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005936699,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001103809,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005401539,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997537,0.00005688562,0.000007798627,0.00004357797,0.00006314898,0.00007494316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986545,0.0008073401,0.0001530284,0.0001684065,0.00007029856,0.0001464346],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006755834,0.0005297309,0.00997103,0.0001404003,0.000101544,0.001162602,0.001199719,0.3953016,0.3410387,0.2357772,0.000367087,0.01373478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003254946,0.0002544649,0.002325353,0.000006995072,0.00002377663,0.00009198923,0.0002014948,0.9540497,0.02879217,0.01399446,0.0001749342,0.00005217122],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9839168,0.00004419205,0.01409554,0.00007788708,0.000005664755,0.000008079837,0.00001300351,0.00004344203,0.00179539],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992441,0.00002436799,0.0005920875,0.000006207213,0.000001528866,0.000005168141,0.000007267466,0.000009890703,0.000109311],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.001580972,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.005288899,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01526582600425623,"score_gpt":0.2667139976044782,"score_spread":0.251448171600222,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}