{"id":"W2515216667","doi":"10.1111/ijlh.12557","title":"Validation of a Blood Stability Score as an easy‐to‐use blood sample quality index","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Laboratory Hematology","topic":"Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control","field":"Medicine","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"World Anti-Doping Agency","funders":"Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois; World Anti-Doping Agency","keywords":"Sample (material); Stability (learning theory); Statistics; Blood preservation; Sample size determination; Computer science; Blood collection; Reliability engineering; Mathematics; Medicine; Chromatography; Chemistry; Emergency medicine; Engineering; Andrology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002342433,0.000181022,0.000778912,0.0002675676,0.00003302221,0.00003617492,0.0003824161,0.0002052757,0.0007193193],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02197104,0.0001279064,0.0001834213,0.0002626423,0.0001698851,0.000828937,0.00007672317,0.0003033135,0.00001802929],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006382803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009742156,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001181276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006583468,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9959973,0.0007900852,0.001814637,0.0002985511,0.0008907208,0.0002087576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9887866,0.003186004,0.001645548,0.0004507671,0.005515054,0.0004159863],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00411118,0.002526416,0.8402119,0.0000628463,0.001067968,0.0002334243,0.0002564927,0.000002609747,0.128993,0.02170478,0.00006185426,0.0007675136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02787297,0.006292378,0.289893,0.001133119,0.001654143,0.001505906,0.0006518887,0.00001543667,0.6403224,0.01346186,0.01648876,0.0007081169],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9899469,0.00008643042,0.002498775,0.006241355,0.0006102915,0.0002121034,0.0003433393,0.00002064035,0.00004013707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954106,0.00004408545,0.002302369,0.001906632,0.0002857794,0.000005573042,0.00001018338,0.00002022949,0.00001461427],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5503189,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9862673,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08499502409769163,"score_gpt":0.4146421141595917,"score_spread":0.3296470900619001,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}